VICTORY HAMMER 8-BALL (2010-on) Review, Specs & Prices (2024)

VICTORY HAMMER 8-BALL (2010-on) Review, Specs & Prices (1)

MCN rating 3 out of 5 (3/5)

Owners' rating 4.8 out of 5 (4.8/5)

SpecsOwners' reviewsBikes for saleFor sale

VICTORY HAMMER 8-BALL (2010-on) Review, Specs & Prices (2)


At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5)
Power: 92 bhp
Seat height: Low (26.0 in / 660 mm)
Weight: High (673 lbs / 305 kg)




View bikes for sale

Overall rating

3 out of 5 (3/5)

The Victory Hammer 8-Ball is basically a lower-seat, cheaper specification version of the Hammer muscle bike. It still has the same gutsy motor, but instead of twin front brake discs it has a single caliper and rotor, plain black paint instead of the more upmarket finish usually seen and the suspension is lowered front and rear to drop the seat 17mm. The footpegs are further back to suit short riders too. The result is a loss of ground clearance and braking capability for the £1000 saving.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine

3 out of 5 (3/5)

The standard and S-model Hammer are relatively useful through the bends. The Hammer 8-Balls’ chassis is equally capable, and more manageable at low speed, but the lower chassis calls time on fun very early – the pegs can be scraped doing u-turns. It’s a serious limit on what can be done. The single disc has less feel too. If you feel the need for the lower seat, you have to accept you can’t ride it through turns so hard.


Next up: Reliability

4 out of 5 (4/5)

Unlike Harley-Davidson’s pushrod engines, Victory’s DOHC 1731cc twin is a modern feeling engine. It sits in a happy middleground between the characterful but crude Hogs, and the smooth but anodyne parallel twin of the Triumph Thunderbird. There’s just enough thudding vibes to give it a bit of character, but it’s happy to rev hard to its redline without rattling the fluid out of your spine. 90-odd bhp and 113lb-ft of torque is serious shove.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value

4 out of 5 (4/5)

One of the key attractions of Victorys, especially next to H-Ds, is the build quality. There are very few nasty or crude details, and paint/metal finishing is to a very high standard. Reliability issues are almost unheard of – the odd niggle, but nothing more than you’d expect from any manufacturer.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment

3 out of 5 (3/5)

It’s an expensive bike – but there’s a lot of metal, a lot of engine and a lot of road presence. But unless you really need the lower seat height and can’t stretch an extra £1000 for the standard model, the ground clearance and braking sacrifice isn’t worth it. Find a Victory Hammer for sale


2 out of 5 (2/5)

The 8-Ball is the cheaper version of a simple bike, so you get very little. There’s no rev counter, you get one less brake disc, and there’s very little else to it. There’s pillion seat under the cowl, but it’s barely worth mentioning, let alone using. It’s a muscle bike: buy a tourer if you want loads of features and gadgets. Compare and buy parts for the Victory in the MCN Shop.


Engine size1731cc
Engine type8v DOHC air-cooled v-twin, 6 gears. Belt drive
Frame typeSteel cradle
Fuel capacity17 litres
Seat height660mm
Bike weight305kg
Front suspensionnone
Rear suspensionPreload only
Front brake300mm disc, 4-piston caliper
Rear brake300mm disc, 2-piston caliper
Front tyre size130/70-R18
Rear tyre size250/40-R18

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption40 mpg
Annual road tax£117
Annual service cost-
New price£11,495
Used price£8,500
Insurance group15 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty termTwo year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power92 bhp
Max torque113 ft-lb
Top speed115 mph
1/4 mile acceleration-
Tank range140 miles

Model history & versions

Model history

2010: New model

Other versions

Victory Hammer: The standard model. Muscle bike with 240-section back tyre and lurid paint for 2010.
Victory Hammer Sport: Lighter wheels, all-black chassis detailing and hot-rod paint finishes make the Sport model the one to have if you can stretch to the price.

Owners' reviewsfor the VICTORY HAMMER (2010 - on)

4 owners have reviewed their VICTORY HAMMER (2010 - on) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your VICTORY HAMMER (2010 - on)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.8 out of 5 (4.8/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Engine: 5 out of 5 (5/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.5 out of 5 (4.5/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.2 out of 5 (4.2/5)
Equipment: 3.2 out of 5 (3.2/5)

4 out of 5 Fancy buying a bike they've stopped making.... 😀

10 October 2021 by Dave

Year: 2013

Recently bought my Hammer, I do love its made me smile again. Against it: seems like some lag in the gearbox which I'll have a look at. Power seems a lot more than my 1700 Thunderbird in all ways. I had the 2300 Rocket before the Thunderbird and the Victory Hammer I feel is more like that that the Thunderbird. But I will say I think the Thunderbird is the most forgiving cruiser I've ridden, (best handling). But I wouldn't swap the Hammer back in.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

At the moment as I've only gone two hours out had a coffee and two hours back which was fine, without a dead arse, the wife has been on for a quick spin around as a pillion about hour and a quarter without tapping me for a stop. All good.

Engine 5 out of 5

Plenty of torque, which is what I look for on a cruiser.

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Harder seat than I'm used to but overall very comfortable.

Value vs rivals 3 out of 5

Not really my place to comment on this one yet.

Equipment 2 out of 5

Fuel gauge would be nice, favourite feature would have to be the single clock with internal rev counter, the single clock looks good on this style of motorcycle.

5 out of 5 Hammer 8 Ball one month on

28 May 2012 by

Done 1000 miles and fitted a stage one slip on exhaust kit, it now sounds like it should.Cracking the throttle at traffic lights produces a wide grin and lets all traffic know you're there.Servicing is very reasonable because intervals are now 5000 miles, there are no major services and current rates are £160 a pop. I'm surprised this is not publicised more.The ride is firm well controlled and comfortable. Pegs grounding early is a cruiser trait that sportsbike fans need to get their head around and accept.The only things I would like added is a fuel guage and a second front disc. It is a bike that is otherwise difficult to fault.Fit and finish are excellent compared to other bikes in this class and overall although not a cheap bike it represents good value for money.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 First impressions Hammer 8Ball

26 April 2012 by

Had the bike a week, only managed about 200 miles so far because of the weather but I'm very pleased. The motor is a peach with plenty of lazy power to give serious shove in any gear and there are enough vibrations to give some character without becoming uncomfortable. The gearbox is very precise and and easy to use with 6th giving 60 mph at about 2000 rpm. The intruments are all contained in the one chrome covered unit, giving an clean unfussy look that I like. There is a digital rev counter and you can scroll through this with the odometer and trip by use of the headlight flasher type switch on the left bar which is a sensible and convenient. There is a gear indicator and a clock with the usual idiot lights included withing the dial also. It's a shame a tank guage wasn't included in the scrolled displays instead of just a fuel light. Handling is excellent for this type of bike just needing a bit more counter steering than a roadster type bike, this is good considering that 250 mm rear tyre. Being 6'3" I am swapping the foothangers for standard Hammer ones to give me the important 2" extra legroom. I'm also swapping the handlebars for Dragbars because it's no fun hanging on with bent arms on the motorway.The build quality seems top notch and I'm hoping to have a long association with this bike to prove it.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 johnsmail

11 October 2011 by johnsmail2k

Had bike for a year, never worried about single front disc, brakes fine. Does tend to ground cornering too fast but you get used to that. Previously had the Vegas 8 ball and prior to that a string of Kawasaki cruisers. Love the bike.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 3 out of 5

Back to top


Victory Hammer 8-Ball

VICTORY HAMMER 8-BALL (2010-on) Review, Specs & Prices (2024)


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Reed Wilderman

Last Updated:

Views: 5984

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Reed Wilderman

Birthday: 1992-06-14

Address: 998 Estell Village, Lake Oscarberg, SD 48713-6877

Phone: +21813267449721

Job: Technology Engineer

Hobby: Swimming, Do it yourself, Beekeeping, Lapidary, Cosplaying, Hiking, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Reed Wilderman, I am a faithful, bright, lucky, adventurous, lively, rich, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.